manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology

Excessive and inappropriate self-citation or coordinated efforts among several authors to collectively self-cite is strongly discouraged. Please be aware that some publishers do not grant electronic rights for free and that Springer will not be able to refund any costs that may have occurred to receive these permissions. Your comments to the authors should contain all feedback pertaining to the scientific evaluation of the manuscript, as detailed above. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your figures, please make sure that. The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. single or double blind peer review) as well as per journal subject discipline. Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Include the captions in the text file of the manuscript, not in the figure file. Vector graphics containing fonts must have the fonts embedded in the files. Primary research articles require a disclosure statement. Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current. Cite references in the text by name and year in parentheses. Please make sure your title page contains the following information. Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs. In confirming the publication of your article with open access you agree to the Creative Commons Attribution License. Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S, Thevenet D, Nourry C, Nottin S, Bosquet L (2009) Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children. The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a ‘Declarations’ section before the reference list under a heading of ‘Funding’ and/or ‘Competing interests’. ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors, Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018. The text of a research paper should be divided into Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Acknowledgements, Conflict of Interest, and References. After online publication, further changes can only be made in the form of an Erratum, which will be hyperlinked to the article. Please revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. ISSN 1546-1696 (online) Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc. To obtain It is easy to find funding to support open access – please see our funding and support pages for more information. 1999, 2000). Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Specific Instruction for Authors (Download pdf, 132 kB), Mistakes to avoid during manuscript preparation, The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. ‘salami-slicing/publishing’). Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Vector graphics containing fonts must have the fonts embedded in the files. This effect has been widely studied (Abbott 1991; Barakat et al. All authors are requested to make sure that all data and materials as well as software application or custom code support their published claims and comply with field standards. The following statements should be included under the heading "Statements and Declarations" for inclusion in the published paper. This journal operates a type 3 research data policy. ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors; managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication;*. Please note that, in addition to the above requirements, funding information (given that funding is a potential competing interest (as mentioned above)) needs to be disclosed upon submission of the manuscript in the peer review system. These contributions should be listed at the separate title page. The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation. Please prepare your manuscript following the detailed Instructions for Authors for this journal. All tables are to be numbered using Arabic numerals. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Examples include, but are not limited to: position on editorial board, advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships; writing and/or consulting for educational purposes; expert witness; mentoring relations; and so forth. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. Other declarations include Ethics approval, Consent, Data, Material and/or Code availability and Authors’ contribution statements. ). Once typesetting is complete, you will receive a link asking you to confirm your affiliation, choose the publishing model for your article as well as arrange rights and payment of any associated publication cost. manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology “ESM_3.mpg”, “ESM_4.pdf”. All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Changes of authorship by adding or deleting authors, and/or changes in Corresponding Author, and/or changes in the sequence of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journal’s and/or Publisher’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article, - an expression of concern may be placed with the article. 3. 5. During the initial submission, or while a manuscript is under consideration at Nature Cell Biology, if related work from the same authors is submitted or accepted elsewhere they must provide us . Statements should include, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. Use the equation editor or MathType for equations. Materials and Methods must include statement of Human and Animal Rights. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Guidelines for Authors Submitting Work on Genomics / Proteomics, Research Data Policy and Data Availability Statements, Mistakes to avoid during manuscript preparation, data repositories that can assist with this, The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. Thank you for visiting nature.com. Always use footnotes instead of endnotes. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Increased researcher engagement: Open Choice enables access by anyone with an internet connection, immediately on publication. If a study was granted exemption from requiring ethics approval, this should also be detailed in the manuscript (including the reasons for the exemption). A simple way to check this is to make a xerographic copy to see if the necessary distinctions between the different colors are still apparent. There are data repositories that can assist with this and/or will create a link to mask the authorship of your data. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers. . Please note that journals may have individual policies on (sharing) research data in concordance with disciplinary norms and expectations. Your evaluation of the validity and robustness of the data interpretation and conclusions. Springer Nature hybrid journal OA impact analysis, 2018. All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. Name the files consecutively, e.g. 또한 당사의 무료 문법 검사도구를 사용하여 여러분의 연구를 평가할 수 있습니다. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors. 2. 如果在结构精巧的稿件中用精心组织的英语展示您的作品，就能最大限度地让编辑和审稿人理解并公正评估您的作品。许多研究人员发现，获得一些独立支持有助于他们以尽可能美好的方式展示他们的成果。Springer Nature Author Services 的专家可帮助您准备稿件，具体包括润色英语表述、添加有见地的注释、为稿件排版、设计图表、翻译等。, 请注意，使用这些工具或任何其他服务不是发表前必须满足的要求，也不暗示或保证相关文章定会被编辑接受（甚至未必会被选送同行评审）。, 内容が適切に組み立てられ、質の高い英語で書かれた論文を投稿すれば、編集者や査読者が論文を理解し、公正に評価するための最善の機会となります。多くの研究者は、個別のサポートを受けることで、研究結果を可能な限り最高の形で発表できると思っています。Springer Nature Author Servicesのエキスパートが、英文の編集、建設的な提言、論文の書式、図の調整、翻訳など、論文の作成をサポートいたします。, これらのツールや他のサービスをご利用いただくことは、論文を掲載するための要件ではありません。また、編集者が論文を受理したり、査読に選定したりすることを示唆または保証するものではないことにご注意ください。. 1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; 2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; 3) approved the version to be published; and. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on the author list they must declare this in the competing interests section on the submitted manuscript. The research leading to these results received funding from […] under Grant Agreement No[…]. Refer to the supplementary files as “Online Resource”, e.g., "... as shown in the animation (Online Resource 3)", “... additional data are given in Online Resource 4”. Figures should be submitted within the body of the text. Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate). Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. No funds, grants, or other support was received. Authors will be asked to resolve the dispute themselves. Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data. Please note that submissions that do not include relevant declarations will be returned as incomplete. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. Some examples: The list of references should only include works that are cited in the text and that have been published or accepted for publication. Examples of statements to be used when authors have nothing to declare: Authors are responsible for correctness of the statements provided in the manuscript. MSOffice files are also acceptable. Please revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs. ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors, Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018. If available, please always include DOIs as full DOI links in your reference list (e.g. If they are unable the Journal reserves the right to withdraw a manuscript from the editorial process or in case of a published paper raise the issue with the authors’ institution(s) and abide by its guidelines. Open Choice articles do not require transfer of copyright as the copyright remains with the author. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may additionally be stated. Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person. Combination artwork should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi. For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. If the journal that you’re submitting to uses double-blind peer review and you are providing reviewers with access to your data (for example via a repository link, supplementary information or data on request), it is strongly suggested that the authorship in the data is also blinded. In absence of specific instructions and in research fields where it is possible to describe discrete efforts, the Publisher recommends authors to include contribution statements in the work that specifies the contribution of every author in order to promote transparency. 直接拒绝，不给任何机会resubmit。这通常是一个或多个审稿人觉得文章有novelty的问题，这种情况可以appeal，但是概率一般特别低。, 第三关，Resubmit，对于需要小改的情况，一般不需要补充实验，直接针对审稿人的每个疑问写point-by-point的response letter以及修改文章就可以resubmit了。对于大改，一般需要做不少补充实验，然后加上response letter和修改文章，之后再resubmit。关于具体如何回复审稿人意见写response letter，请见nature自然科研的官方说明。, 第四步，Proofreading，如果resubmit之后文章被接收了，那就恭喜啦。通关结果如下：, Proofreading过程主要包括两方面。一方面，就是文章字数，图片格式，引用文献格式等满足相应文章的要求。值得注意的是在初次投稿过程中，不需要高质量的图片，但是在文章接收后，需要高质量的图片。另一方面，则是文章发表需要填写的表格，主要有licence to publish表格以及发表发表费用表格。, Nature系列对格式要求基本是统一的，尤其对图片质量要求比较高。如果投稿时就按照Nature系列的格式来的话那么能为后面正式接收和发表节约时间。Nature系列对格式的要求如下：, 其实各个文章对格式的要求大同小异，只是对公式、引用等格式略有不同。如下面wiley的文章格式要求，可以用来做对比。毕竟nature science搞不定，可能得根据其他杂志格式要求改一改。, 值得一提的是Nature Communications是Nature系列关于透明审稿模式的试验田，也即Nature Communications审稿接受之后会公布Peer-review的材料，同时如果征得了审稿人同意公开信息的话，还会列出审稿人的名字并感谢审稿人的贡献。, 通过看Nature Communications关于透明审稿（transparent peer-review）的操作也能get到一些审稿的信息的。通过看Nature Communications关于透明审稿的统计信息，也能get到一些审稿的信息的，50%以上的审稿人选择公开。相关统计分析Nature Communicaitons有专文，看了还是感觉有点意思的。, 第五步，分享快落。譬如说这时候可以赶紧到知乎上回答“发science或nature是一种什么样的体验？”庆祝下。. Cite references in the text by name and year in parentheses. Interests that should be considered and disclosed but are not limited to the following: Funding: Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number) and/or research support (including salaries, equipment, supplies, reimbursement for attending symposia, and other expenses) by organizations that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript. Identify any previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference at the end of the table caption. Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. Editorial procedure. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article This is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation received for consultancy work is inappropriate. Data availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets): 1. manuscript under editorial consideration nature biotechnology If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. Research Resource Identifiers (RRID) are persistent unique identifiers (effectively similar to a DOI) for research resources. Ecotaxae . Tables should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order. APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services. Editorial criteria and processes | Nature These submissions are subject to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. Nearly all submissions have weaknesses to be addressed: the best and most constructive reports suggest specific improvements; such feedback can be used by authors to improve their manuscript to the point where it might be suitable for acceptance. The "manuscript under consideration" is the process of the editor making their case about whether they think the manuscript is worth sending to peer-review. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. If available, please always include DOIs as full DOI links in your reference list (e.g. 然后就是一些typo修正和格式修改，很快就resubmit了，因为这次是直接接收，实际上没经过审稿人，所以最后的stage就是decision sent to author（不知道为啥要好几遍&还有一个空行）, 然后十一月二十一号给了proof稿，博后非常需要这篇文章所以急着把proof给提交了（大家其实满不爽的），十二月三号收到了nature的邮件，说纸质的publish会在什么时候, Science和Nature差不多，我本科时候有个菜鸡文章投过Science试水光速被拒没进入审稿环节，不过最近我们下一篇工作已经有模有样了，老板说应该Science没问题（2021），但是最后一轮游，转投Nature Physics接收。, 后来22年初做了新的一个工作，年底终于在拖拖拉拉中改完了，最近被Science接收了。Science官网上它的审稿过程不如Nature详细，而且只显示当前状态，如果不仔细盯着看的话很容易漏。, to advisor （有个编辑接手了）-> under evaluation（看看要不要直接拒稿） -> to review （送审了）-> under evaluation（审稿意见回来，编辑汇总）, （1）-> awaiting revision（如果觉得还凑活）-> from revision（收到了我们的revision）-> To Copyediting（排版等发表）, （2）-> Rejected-Transfer Offered（有点菜，算了吧）->xxx（如果transfer到science advances有一种状态，我们没试过）/xxx（如果强行appeal可能会再审一轮）, 第一关，Editor assigned，编辑决定要不要送审 (Peer-review)。判断标准不是实验结果是否正确或技术是否可靠，而是默认文章技术和结论都正确的情况之下，文章的发现 (discovery) 或发明 (invention)是否具有创新性（novel），非同寻常性（unexpected)。官方说法是The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications。对于nature，这个判断一般由编辑们之间内部讨论决定，然后负责该文章的编辑决定是否送审。而对于science，这个判断由特定编辑发送给Board of Reviewing Editors打分决定。science期刊的Board of Reviewing Editors一般是由各个学科的科研大佬组成。大佬先对提交的文章打分，负责该文章的编辑根据打分情况决定是否送审。感觉是否经历Board of Reviewing Editors打分这一步骤是nature和science审稿过程最大的区别。后面的过程都大同小异。Board of Reviewing Editors的成员可以在science官网上找到。如果有很多connection和里面同领域的大佬认识，嘿嘿，你懂的。, 一般少则2天多则2周会决定是否送审。大部分情况下文章过不了第一关，不过梦想还是要有的，万一实现了呢。如果不送审，然后就会是如下结果：, 第二关，Peer-review, 如果第一关过了，恭喜你，文章最后被接收的概率大大增加了。然后就进入喜闻乐见的Peer-review（同行评议）环节了。一般会有不少于两个审稿人，很多情况下是三个审稿人。然后编辑根据三个审稿人的意见，一般会做出如下决定。, 2. When all authors have the same (or no) conflicts and/or funding it is sufficient to use one blanket statement. After online publication, further changes can only be made in the form of an Erratum, which will be hyperlinked to the article. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Die Gänsemagd Kurzfassung, Articles M