Completed Reject: In case the author has made the revisions requested by the peer reviewers and editor, the final decision on the manuscript could be either “accept” or “reject.” In case the editor is not satisfied with the revisions, the paper could be rejected. We focus on the Nature journals as that portfolio covers a wide range of disciplines in the natural sciences and biomedical research, and thus, it gives us an opportunity to identify trends beyond discipline-specific patterns. For this analysis, we included direct submissions as well as transferred manuscripts, because the editorial criteria vary by journal and a manuscript rejected by one journal and transferred to another may then be sent out to review. Web11 Key takeaways •Get yourmain message across. 1536 visitors saw this today and 1210 signed up. //--> Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. The difference, however, is very small. We like that! However, we did not find a combination of predictors that led to a model with a good fit to the data. Web初审流程. Moreover, some records were not complete if authors made spelling mistakes when entering the names of their country or institution, as this would have made it impossible to match those names with normalised names for countries or for institutions using GRID. Similar results are achieved if simpler logistic regression models are considered, such as review type modelled on journal tier and institution and review type modelled on journal tier only. [CDATA[// > At the point of first submission, authors have to indicate whether they wish to have their manuscript considered under SBPR or DBPR, and this choice is maintained if the manuscript is declined by one journal and transferred to another. The dataset contains both direct submissions and transfers, i.e. Both authors designed the study and contributed equally to the “Results” section. Outcome of the first editorial decision (OTR rate) for papers submitted under the two peer review models. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/, https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/initial-submission, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. This might happen if the editor is very busy and there are a lot of other papers queued up at his/her table, waiting for their turn. However, in some exceptional situations, several weeks pass by with this status constantly being displayed, and the author does not receive any decision. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal. Outcome of manuscripts sent to review as a function of the institution group of the corresponding author, regardless of review model. We found that 10 countries contributed to 80% of all submissions, and thus, we grouped all other countries under the category “Others”. Based on these results, we cannot conclude whether the referees are biased towards gender. In order to reduce the variability in the institutional affiliations, we normalised the institution names and countries via a Python script that queried the API of the Global Resource Identified Database (GRID [19]). [CDATA[// > 由于通讯作者是大老板，也不方便去问有没有收到审稿邮件。. We identify two potential causes for this, one being a difference in quality and the other being a gender bias. WebRejected. But, after that, the status still displays "Manuscript under consideration" for 23 days. This resulted in 17,379 (14%) instances of manuscripts whose corresponding author was female, 83,830 (65%) manuscripts with male corresponding author, and 27,245 (21%) manuscripts with gender NA. Subscribe to Journal Submission & Peer Review, Status descriptions in journal submission systems. Why does the status date of a submission change periodically though the status remains unchanged? [CDATA[// >
Oneplus Nord Inaktivitätsdisplay Funktioniert Nicht,
Urteilsverfassungsbeschwerde Schema,
Hartz 4 Vermögensprüfung Rückwirkend,
Articles D
